Dorman, Banking Com'r v. Kavanagh

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Dorman, Banking Com'r v. Kavanagh

54 S.W.2d 46, 245 Ky. 738, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 664

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedNovember 4, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 54 S.W.2d 46 (Dorman, Banking Com'r v. Kavanagh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorman, Banking Com'r v. Kavanagh, 54 S.W.2d 46, 245 Ky. 738, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 664 (Ky. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam—

Original action in the Court of Appeals, in which the plaintiffs pray that this court issue its writ of prohibition against the defendant, J. J. Kavanagh, enjoining, restraining, and prohibiting him from hearing, considering, or ruling upon any matter pertaining to the suspension of liquidation of the Central Trust Company of Owensboro, Ky., or to the reorganization and reopening of same, and any other matter with respect to the affairs of-said closed institution, except the application for authority to assess double liability against the stockholders of said bank.

It appearing that the defendant, J. J. Kavanagh, has heretofore tendered his resignation as special judge of the Daviess circuit court and that same has been accepted, this case has become moot and is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Curiam—

Original action in the Court of Appeals, in which the plaintiffs pray that this court issue its writ of prohibition against the defendant, J. J. Kavanagh, enjoining, restraining, and prohibiting him from hearing, considering, or ruling upon any matter pertaining to the suspension of liquidation of the Central Trust Company of Owensboro, Ky., or to the reorganization and reopening of same, and any other matter with respect to the affairs of-said closed institution, except the application for authority to assess double liability against the stockholders of said bank.

It appearing that the defendant, J. J. Kavanagh, has heretofore tendered his resignation as special judge of the Daviess circuit court and that same has been accepted, this case has become moot and is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 S.W.2d 46, 245 Ky. 738, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorman-banking-comr-v-kavanagh-kyctapphigh-1932.