Dorland v. Superior Court Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 568 (Dorland v. Superior Court Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel respondent to make an order directing that relat- or’s witness’ and attorney fees in a street-opening case be taxed and paid by the City.
[572]*572Granted as to witness’ fees, but denied as to attorney fees, November 15, 1889.
Held, that Sec. 19, of Act No. 236, Laws of 1889, making it lawful for a judge in a street-opening case to order the payment by the city to respondent of such a reasonable attorney fee as he may deem just, not exceeding $25, is not mandatory, but the matter of attorney fees is left discretionary with the judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 568, 78 McGrath 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorland-v-superior-court-judge-mich-1889.