Dorland v. Dorland
This text of 5 Cow. 417 (Dorland v. Dorland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The second execution was irregular. The farthest we have gone, before the first execution returned, is, to allow another in a county different from the one to which the first issued. The consent of Borland cannot affect the rights of Willets. The second fi. fa. and all subsequent proceedings upon it, must be set aside with costs, on the defendant, Willets, stipulating to bring no action for the levy under it.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Cow. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorland-v-dorland-nysupct-1826.