Dorisene Anderson v. Target Corporation
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer, Target Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Anderson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
268 F. App'x 487 (Dorisene Anderson v. Target Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.