Doris Williams v. State of AR
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 00-3324 ___________
Doris Williams, as Guardian of * Donald Williams, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. State of Arkansas; Department of * Health and Human Services; Margo * [UNPUBLISHED] Green, Director; John Does, * * Appellees. * ___________
Submitted: May 3, 2001
Filed: May 10, 2001 ___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Doris Williams, as Guardian of Donald Williams, appeals the district court's dismissal of Williams's claim for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude Williams's claim is foreclosed by the Supreme Court's decision in Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 121 S. Ct. 955 (2001), and our decision in Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999 (8th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. granted, 120 S. Ct. 1003, and dismissed, 120 S. Ct. 1265 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doris Williams v. State of AR (Doris Williams v. State of AR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.