Doris Louise Allen v. Honorable William Harold Cox, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

387 F.2d 388, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4203
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 12, 1967·No. 25046·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It having been represented to the Court on oral argument that discovery proceedings in this cause have not been but can be completed by petitioners in the District Court by January 30, 1968, which is prior to the next regular term of the District Court for the trial of causes, and that certain motions pertaining to further discovery have been and will be filed in the District Court by petitioners;

It is upon consideration ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition or mandamus is denied, without prejudice, however, to the petitioners’ application to the District Court under the rules thereof, and upon good cause shown, for an extension of time for discovery.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doris Louise Allen v. Honorable William Harold Cox, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, 387 F.2d 388, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4203 (5th Cir. 1967).

387 F.2d 388 (Doris Louise Allen v. Honorable William Harold Cox, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.