Doris L. Gardiner v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Doris L. Gardiner v. United States

238 F.2d 23, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 162

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 27, 1956

Docket13211

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 F.2d 23 (Doris L. Gardiner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doris L. Gardiner v. United States, 238 F.2d 23, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 162 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the narcotics laws. Appellant makes two points, (1) that an instruction concerning the consideration of testimony of an informer was inadequate and (2) that the evidence was insufficient. We think the instruction was adequate and correct and that the evidence was ample to present a case for the jury. The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the narcotics laws. Appellant makes two points, (1) that an instruction concerning the consideration of testimony of an informer was inadequate and (2) that the evidence was insufficient. We think the instruction was adequate and correct and that the evidence was ample to present a case for the jury. The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 F.2d 23, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doris-l-gardiner-v-united-states-cadc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack