Doris Hope-Jackson v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2012·No. 145864·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 20, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 145864 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, DORIS HOPE-JACKSON, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 145864 AGC: 0256-12 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 20, 2012 _________________________________________ s1113 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doris Hope-Jackson v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2012).

Doris Hope-Jackson v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Doris Hope-Jackson v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.