Dorina Corrente v. Cassandra Van Atten, as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of James Van Atten Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
Docket13-18-00599-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dorina Corrente v. Cassandra Van Atten, as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of James Van Atten Jr. (Dorina Corrente v. Cassandra Van Atten, as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of James Van Atten Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorina Corrente v. Cassandra Van Atten, as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of James Van Atten Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00599-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

DORINA CORRENTE, Appellant,

v.

CASSANDRA VAN ATTEN, AS THE GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF JAMES VAN ATTEN JR., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant Dorina Corrente filed a notice of appeal from an order signed on

September 26, 2018 in trial court cause number 2013-DCL-7541-G in the 404th District

Court of Cameron County, Texas. On December 11, 2018, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellant that the clerk’s record in the above cause was originally due on November 26, 2018, and that the Deputy District Clerk, Christina Hernandez, had notified

this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record.

The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to

correct the defect if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c). The Clerk

advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if the defect

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice

Delivered and filed the 31st day of January, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dorina Corrente v. Cassandra Van Atten, as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of James Van Atten Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorina-corrente-v-cassandra-van-atten-as-the-guardian-of-the-person-and-texapp-2019.