Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)

D.C. Circuit

Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 3, 2024

Docket23-5169

StatusUnpublished

This text of Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER) (Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER), (D.C. Cir. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-5169 September Term, 2024 1:18-cv-00038-RBW Filed On: October 3, 2024 Dorian Van Horn,

Appellant

v.

Carlos Del Toro, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Navy,

Appellee

BEFORE: Srinivasan, Chief Judge; and Wilkins and Walker, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to amend the unpublished judgment or, in the alternative, petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the motion to amend be granted. The judgment filed June 21, 2024, is hereby amended as follows:

(1) On page 4, second ¶, delete:

It is of no consequence that Muldrow was a private-sector Title VII case whereas this is a federal-sector ADEA case. We have always interpreted Title VII and the ADEA identically as far as adverse actions go, and we have likewise always treated the private-sector and federalsector provisions of those statutes alike in that respect. See George v. Leavitt, 407 F.3d 405, 410–11 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191, 1196 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Miller v. Clinton, 687 F.3d 1332, 1336–37 (D.C. Cir. 2012). Understandably, no one asks us to do otherwise here.

The Clerk is directed to issued the amended judgment. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-5169 September Term, 2024 1:18-cv-00038-RBW Filed On: October 3, 2024 Dorian Van Horn,

Appellant

v.

Carlos Del Toro, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Navy,

Appellee

BEFORE: Srinivasan, Chief Judge; and Wilkins and Walker, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to amend the unpublished judgment or, in the alternative, petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the motion to amend be granted. The judgment filed June 21, 2024, is hereby amended as follows:

(1) On page 4, second ¶, delete:

It is of no consequence that Muldrow was a private-sector Title VII case whereas this is a federal-sector ADEA case. We have always interpreted Title VII and the ADEA identically as far as adverse actions go, and we have likewise always treated the private-sector and federalsector provisions of those statutes alike in that respect. See George v. Leavitt, 407 F.3d 405, 410–11 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191, 1196 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Miller v. Clinton, 687 F.3d 1332, 1336–37 (D.C. Cir. 2012). Understandably, no one asks us to do otherwise here.

The Clerk is directed to issued the amended judgment. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorian-van-horn-v-carlos-del-toro-order-cadc-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack