Doria v. Buchstein

227 A.D.2d 438, 643 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5123
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 438 (Doria v. Buchstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doria v. Buchstein, 227 A.D.2d 438, 643 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated April 28, 1995, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon renewal, the plaintiffs have failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether either of them sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henao v. Ting Sal Ping
257 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D.2d 438, 643 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doria-v-buchstein-nyappdiv-1996.