Dorfman v. Texaco, Inc.
271 N.E.2d 554, 28 N.Y.2d 886, 322 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1337
Opinions
Concur: Chief Judge Fxjld and Judges Scileppi, Breitel and Jasen. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial in the following opinion in which Judges Bergan and Gibson concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorfman v. Texaco, Inc., 271 N.E.2d 554, 28 N.Y.2d 886, 322 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1337 (N.Y. 1971).
271 N.E.2d 554 (Dorfman v. Texaco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mead v. . Parker
18 N.E. 727 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Halverson v. 562 West 149th St. Corp.
47 N.E.2d 685 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Salt Springs National Bank v. Sloan
32 N.E. 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hull v. . Littauer
57 N.E. 102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Conroy v. Saratoga Springs Authority
31 N.E.2d 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Mara v. Tunney
236 A.D. 82 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Conroy v. Saratoga Springs Authority
259 A.D. 365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Veihelmann v. Manufacturers Safe Deposit Co.
104 N.E.2d 888 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)