Dorfman v. Samuel Ehrman Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dorfman v. Samuel Ehrman Co.

252 A.D. 858, 300 N.Y.S. 716, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 858 (Dorfman v. Samuel Ehrman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorfman v. Samuel Ehrman Co., 252 A.D. 858, 300 N.Y.S. 716, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order dated July 13,1937, granting plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection, and from an order dated July 23, 1937, granting reargument, and on reargument modifying the original order by striking therefrom two items of inspection. Order dated July 23,1937, modified so as to provide that the time for the examination of defendant’s records be limited to thirty days from the commencement of such examination, by eliminating that part of item 18 which requires the production of statements issued to banks and financial agencies, and (in view of the decision of this court, dated October fourth, granting a stay) by striking out the paragraph denying a stay pending the determination of the appeal. As so modified, the order is affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken, without costs; the examination to begin on five days’ notice. Appeal from the original order, dated July 13, 1937, dismissed. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order dated July 13,1937, granting plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection, and from an order dated July 23, 1937, granting reargument, and on reargument modifying the original order by striking therefrom two items of inspection. Order dated July 23,1937, modified so as to provide that the time for the examination of defendant’s records be limited to thirty days from the commencement of such examination, by eliminating that part of item 18 which requires the production of statements issued to banks and financial agencies, and (in view of the decision of this court, dated October fourth, granting a stay) by striking out the paragraph denying a stay pending the determination of the appeal. As so modified, the order is affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken, without costs; the examination to begin on five days’ notice. Appeal from the original order, dated July 13, 1937, dismissed. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 858, 300 N.Y.S. 716, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorfman-v-samuel-ehrman-co-nyappdiv-1937.