Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 410
United States Customs Court·Decided October 27, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9827; Entry No. 920394·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the deci[541]*541sion of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 540 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 540 (Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.