Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 279, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1106

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 29, 1953

DocketNo. 57579; protest 200708-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Cust. Ct. 279 (Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 279, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1106 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that in the liquidation of the entry the merchandise was assessed with duty on the ground that the importer had [280]*280not filed a certificate of outward manifest; that a proper certificate of outward manifest has now been filed and that had said certificate been in the possession of the collector at the time of the review of the protest, the merchandise would have been granted free entry under paragraph 1615, supra; and that the facts are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104. In view of the agreed statement of facts and following the decision cited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that in the liquidation of the entry the merchandise was assessed with duty on the ground that the importer had [280]*280not filed a certificate of outward manifest; that a proper certificate of outward manifest has now been filed and that had said certificate been in the possession of the collector at the time of the review of the protest, the merchandise would have been granted free entry under paragraph 1615, supra; and that the facts are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104. In view of the agreed statement of facts and following the decision cited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Cust. Ct. 279, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorf-international-ltd-v-united-states-cusc-1953.