Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp.

623 So. 2d 1254, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9972, 1993 WL 390370
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 So. 2d 1254 (Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp., 623 So. 2d 1254, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9972, 1993 WL 390370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellees correctly concede that the trial court erred in granting final summary judgment against defendants. “A summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so crystallized that nothing remains but [1255]*1255questions of law.” Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985). “If the existence of such issues or the possibility of their existence is reflected in the record, or the record raises even the slightest [reasonable] doubt in this respect, the judgment must be reversed.” Briadi Trading Co. v. Anthony R. Abraham Trading Enter., Inc., 469 So.2d 955, 956 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). The record in this case demonstrates that issues of fact exist. Thus, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 So. 2d 1254, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9972, 1993 WL 390370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorez-electronics-corp-v-fleet-credit-leasing-corp-fladistctapp-1993.