Dorey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

51 N.E. 974, 172 Mass. 234
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 23, 1898·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hammond, J.

This is an action by the administratrix of the estate of Orissime Dorey on an insurance policy on the life of said Dorey, dated May 13, 1895. By the terms of the policy no obligation was assumed by the defendant unless the insured was, at its date, in sound health. At the trial before a jury the only issue was whether or not Dorey was in sound health at that time. Upon this question evidence was introduced on each side. Without reciting it here in detail, it is sufficient to say that the evidence introduced by the plaintiff would, if believed, warrant a verdict for the plaintiff, and that introduced by the defendant would, if believed, warrant a verdict for the defendant. A pure question of fact, and not of law, was raised. The first request was rightly refused.

Although the second request was not given in its exact terms, it was substantially given, and in clear language.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 51 N.E. 974, 172 Mass. 234 (Mass. 1898).

51 N.E. 974 (Dorey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleckenstein v. Provident Insurance
186 N.W. 91 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1921)
Marzulli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
78 A. 1051 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1911)
Packard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
54 A. 287 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1903)