Doremus v. . Auerbach
120 N.E. 861, 223 N.Y. 709, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1422
This text of 120 N.E. 861 (Doremus v. . Auerbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doremus v. . Auerbach, 120 N.E. 861, 223 N.Y. 709, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1422 (N.Y. 1918).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Auerbach: Chase, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Olsen v. State
30 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Bein v. City of New York
271 F. Supp. 542 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Dinkuhn v. Western New York Water Co.
252 A.D. 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
238 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Sieger v. William L. Crow Construction Co.
235 A.D. 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.
171 N.E. 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
O'NEILL v. Gray
30 F.2d 776 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 N.E. 861, 223 N.Y. 709, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doremus-v-auerbach-ny-1918.