Doremus v. . Auerbach

120 N.E. 861, 223 N.Y. 709, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1422
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1918·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Auerbach: Chase, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doremus v. . Auerbach, 120 N.E. 861, 223 N.Y. 709, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1422 (N.Y. 1918).

120 N.E. 861 (Doremus v. . Auerbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olsen v. State
30 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Bein v. City of New York
271 F. Supp. 542 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Dinkuhn v. Western New York Water Co.
252 A.D. 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
238 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Sieger v. William L. Crow Construction Co.
235 A.D. 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.
171 N.E. 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
O'NEILL v. Gray
30 F.2d 776 (Second Circuit, 1929)