Dorema v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dorema v. State

766 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11030, 2000 WL 1225858

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 2000

DocketNo. 4D00-2298

StatusPublished

This text of 766 So. 2d 442 (Dorema v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorema v. State, 766 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11030, 2000 WL 1225858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the order of the trial court summarily denying Jackson Dorema’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000). As we did in Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentence under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.800 relief and remand for reconsideration of whether sentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We review the order of the trial court summarily denying Jackson Dorema’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000). As we did in Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentence under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.800 relief and remand for reconsideration of whether sentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11030, 2000 WL 1225858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorema-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack