Dorema v. State

766 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11030, 2000 WL 1225858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2298·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the order of the trial court summarily denying Jackson Dorema’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000). As we did in Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentence under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.800 relief and remand for reconsideration of whether sentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorema v. State, 766 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11030, 2000 WL 1225858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 442 (Dorema v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speed v. State
764 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)