Doreatha Robinson v. the Oaks 4614 LLC, Individually and D/B/A the Oaks Apartments MBP Texas, LLC, Individually and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily Management and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily And Roscoe Properties, Inc

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2019
Docket05-18-01515-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Doreatha Robinson v. the Oaks 4614 LLC, Individually and D/B/A the Oaks Apartments MBP Texas, LLC, Individually and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily Management and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily And Roscoe Properties, Inc (Doreatha Robinson v. the Oaks 4614 LLC, Individually and D/B/A the Oaks Apartments MBP Texas, LLC, Individually and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily Management and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily And Roscoe Properties, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doreatha Robinson v. the Oaks 4614 LLC, Individually and D/B/A the Oaks Apartments MBP Texas, LLC, Individually and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily Management and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily And Roscoe Properties, Inc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01515-CV

DOREATHA ROBINSON, Appellant V. THE OAKS 4614 LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE OAKS APARTMENTS; MBP TEXAS, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY; AND ROSCOE PROPERTIES, INC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04167

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Schenck By letter dated January 7, 2019, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it

appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of

McKinney, LLC, 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely

filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional). We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing

the Court’s concern. Appellant filed a letter brief in response to the Court’s request, but did not

address the jurisdictional issue.

When a timely motion for new trial is filed, a notice of appeal is due ninety days, or with

an extension motion, 105 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1; Brashear, 302 S.W.3d at 545.

The record reflects the trial court signed an agreed order of dismissal on July 30, 2018. The

record also reflects appellant sent a letter dated August 7, 2018 to the trial court asking it to

“withdraw” the order. Construing the letter as a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal should

have been filed no later than October 29, 2018 or, with an extension motion, no later than

November 13, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(a), 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal

on December 17, 2018.

Because appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

181515F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DOREATHA ROBINSON, Appellant On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-01515-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04167. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, THE OAKS 4614 LLC, INDIVIDUALLY Justices Brown and Pedersen, III AND D/B/A THE OAKS APARTMENTS; participating. MBP TEXAS, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY; AND ROSCOE PROPERTIES, INC, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 27th day of February, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C.
302 S.W.3d 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Doreatha Robinson v. the Oaks 4614 LLC, Individually and D/B/A the Oaks Apartments MBP Texas, LLC, Individually and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily Management and D/B/A Catalyst Multifamily And Roscoe Properties, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doreatha-robinson-v-the-oaks-4614-llc-individually-and-dba-the-oaks-texapp-2019.