Doreatha Robinson v. Oak Apartment
This text of Doreatha Robinson v. Oak Apartment (Doreatha Robinson v. Oak Apartment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 27, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00300-CV
DOREATHA ROBINSON, Appellant V. THE OAKS 4614 LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE OAKS APARTMENTS, MBP TEXAS, LLC, INDIVDUALLY AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY, AND ROSCOE PROPERTIES, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04167
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Smith Opinion by Justice Osborne The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the notice
of appeal was untimely. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the
Court’s concern. Although appellant filed a letter, she failed to address the
jurisdictional issue.
When a party files a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate
timetable, a notice of appeal is due ninety days or, with an extension motion, fifteen
days after the due date. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a), 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of
McKinney, LLC, 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on
reh’g) (timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional).
The trial court signed the judgment on July 30, 2018. The record reflects
appellant filed a letter on August 20, 2018 asking the trial court to “withdraw” the
judgment.1 Construing the letter as a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal should
have been filed no later than October 29, 2018 or, with an extension motion, no later
than November 13, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(a), 26.3. Appellant filed
the notice of appeal on April 5, 2022, more than three years past the due date.
Because appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a).
/Leslie Osborne// 220300f.p05 LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
1 This order is viewable on the trial court’s website. –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DOREATHA ROBINSON, On Appeal from the 68th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04167. No. 05-22-00300-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Schenck and Smith THE OAKS 4614 LLC, participating. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE OAKS APARTMENTS, MBP TEXAS, LLC, INDIVDUALLY AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT AND D/B/A CATALYST MULTIFAMILY, AND ROSCOE PROPERTIES, INC., Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered this 27th day of July, 2022.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doreatha Robinson v. Oak Apartment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doreatha-robinson-v-oak-apartment-texapp-2022.