Dore v. Benedict

Idaho Supreme Court

Dore v. Benedict

167 P. 1165, 30 Idaho 731, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 104

DecidedOctober 2, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 167 P. 1165 (Dore v. Benedict) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dore v. Benedict, 167 P. 1165, 30 Idaho 731, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 104 (Idaho 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

BUDGE, C. J.

The parties to the above-entitled action and their respective attorneys have stipulated, “that the judge[732]*732ment to be rendered upon appeal in the above-entitled action shall be governed by the judgment that may be rendered in the case of Timothy Dore, as Special Deputy State Bank Commissioner of the Leadore State Bank, Plaintiff, v. Morris H. Cottom, Defendant,” ante, p. 696, 167 Pac. 1164. Upon the authority of that ease the judgment of the trial court in this cause is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Morgan and Bice, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDGE, C. J.

The parties to the above-entitled action and their respective attorneys have stipulated, “that the judge[732]*732ment to be rendered upon appeal in the above-entitled action shall be governed by the judgment that may be rendered in the case of Timothy Dore, as Special Deputy State Bank Commissioner of the Leadore State Bank, Plaintiff, v. Morris H. Cottom, Defendant,” ante, p. 696, 167 Pac. 1164. Upon the authority of that ease the judgment of the trial court in this cause is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Morgan and Bice, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 P. 1165, 30 Idaho 731, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dore-v-benedict-idaho-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack