DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
756 CA 14-02166 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.
MARY DORE-COCKERHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
TOWN OF FORESTPORT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MARTIN J. KERNAN, ORISKANY, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered March 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.
Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT (DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.