DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 2015·No. CA 14-02166·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

756 CA 14-02166 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MARY DORE-COCKERHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

TOWN OF FORESTPORT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARTIN J. KERNAN, ORISKANY, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered March 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT (DORE-COCKERHAM, MARY v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.