Dorchester County Solid Waste Department v. Schieble

Fourth Circuit

Dorchester County Solid Waste Department v. Schieble

84 F. App'x 361

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2004

DocketNo. 03-2002

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 361 (Dorchester County Solid Waste Department v. Schieble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorchester County Solid Waste Department v. Schieble, 84 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert John Schieble, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the civil action against him to state court. The district court’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert John Schieble, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the civil action against him to state court. The district court’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F. App'x 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorchester-county-solid-waste-department-v-schieble-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack