Doran v. Sherman

California Court of Appeal

Doran v. Sherman

56 P.2d 973, 13 Cal. App. 2d 226, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 703

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doran v. Sherman. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Cal. App. 2d 479 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided April 13, 1936·No. Civ. No. 10054·Published

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Motion to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment. The motion to dismiss is based on the contention that the record on appeal has not been properly prepared. In our opinion the record contains everything necessary for a proper consideration of the question presented. The motion to affirm the judgment is made upon the ground that the appeal is not meritorious. The question presented for determination upon the merits involves the validity of the judgment of the municipal court, which question requires further consideration.

The motion to dismiss or affirm is denied.

Cashin, J., and Knight, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

Motion to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment. The motion to dismiss is based on the contention that the record on appeal has not been properly prepared. In our opinion the record contains everything necessary for a proper consideration of the question presented. The motion to affirm the judgment is made upon the ground that the appeal is not meritorious. The question presented for determination upon the merits involves the validity of the judgment of the municipal court, which question requires further consideration.

The motion to dismiss or affirm is denied.

Cashin, J., and Knight, J., concurred.

Doran v. Sherman, 56 P.2d 973, 13 Cal. App. 2d 226, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 703 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

56 P.2d 973 (Doran v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.