Doran v. Ohio German Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Doran v. Ohio German Fire Insurance

117 N.W. 1125, 106 Minn. 535, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 773

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 30, 1908

DocketNos. 15,828—(60)

StatusPublished

This text of 117 N.W. 1125 (Doran v. Ohio German Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doran v. Ohio German Fire Insurance, 117 N.W. 1125, 106 Minn. 535, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 773 (Mich. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves the question whether the respondent was employed by the appellant, Ohio German Fire Insurance Co., or by its general agents, Loeb & Sons, of Chicago. The trial court found that he was employed by the company as its special agent, and there is evidence to sustain the finding. The questions raised are without merit, and the order denying the motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves the question whether the respondent was employed by the appellant, Ohio German Fire Insurance Co., or by its general agents, Loeb & Sons, of Chicago. The trial court found that he was employed by the company as its special agent, and there is evidence to sustain the finding. The questions raised are without merit, and the order denying the motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 N.W. 1125, 106 Minn. 535, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doran-v-ohio-german-fire-insurance-minn-1908.