Doran v. Doran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Doran v. Doran

57 So. 3d 933, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4179, 2011 WL 1108800

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2011·No. No. 1D10-6841·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 13, 2011, the Court has determined that the Amended Final Judgment is not a final order as it reserves jurisdiction to expend additional judicial labor over the non-collateral issue of child support. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion to Extend Time for Filing, filed on March 9, 2011, is denied as moot.

THOMAS, WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 13, 2011, the Court has determined that the Amended Final Judgment is not a final order as it reserves jurisdiction to expend additional judicial labor over the non-collateral issue of child support. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion to Extend Time for Filing, filed on March 9, 2011, is denied as moot.

THOMAS, WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Doran v. Doran, 57 So. 3d 933, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4179, 2011 WL 1108800 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

57 So. 3d 933 (Doran v. Doran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related