Doran v. Commissioner

1956 T.C. Memo. 121, 15 T.C.M. 629, 1956 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doran v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 T.C. 374
United States Tax Court·Decided May 18, 1956·No. Docket Nos. 51871-51874, 51877-51880.·Unpublished

Opinion

Thomas F. Doran, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.
Doran v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 51871-51874, 51877-51880.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1956-121; 1956 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 175; 15 T.C.M. (CCH) 629; T.C.M. (RIA) 56121;
May 18, 1956
*175 Roy E. Lowe, Esq., Spokane & Eastern Building, Spokane, Wash., for the petitioners. Gordon N. Cromwell, Esq., for the respondent.

WITHEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

WITHEY, Judge: The Commissioner has determined a deficiency in income tax of the petitioners for 1947 as follows:

PetitionerDkt. No.Deficiency
Thomas F. Doran51871$ 884.56
Ethel M. Doran51872922.06
Oney S. Riggs51873854.74
Dorothy F. Riggs51874854.74
Ida Bee MacDonald51877984.25
Clara Nieman518785,582.16
Gus H. Nieman518795,491.91
John W. MacDonald51880984.25

The issue for decision is whether petitioners as stockholders of a corporation received taxable dividend distributions by the application on the purchase price of stock in that corporation for their accounts of the proceeds of a life insurance policy, the premiums upon which had been paid by the corporation.

Findings of Fact

All the stipulated facts are found accordingly. These cases have been consolidated for trial and opinion.

At all times material herein the following petitioners were and still are husband and wife: Thomas F. Doran and Ethel M. Doran; Oney S. Riggs*176 and Dorothy F. Riggs; John W. MacDonald and Ida Bee MacDonald; and Gus H. Nieman and Clara Nieman. Each petitioner filed his or her separate individual income tax return for 1947 with the collector of internal revenue at Tacoma, Washington.

Inland Motor Freight, hereinafter referred to as Inland is a Washington corporation with its principal office in Spokane. During the year at issue it was a public carrier of freight and commodities for hire. All of the husband-petitioners herein and Grover C. Ealy had been since 1943, and continued to be in 1947, stockholders and actively engaged in the operation and management of Inland. Ealy died on March 19, 1947. All were members of the board of directors. Ealy was principal stockholder and president of Inland at his death. There were in addition four other stockholders not involved in this controversy.

Prior to July 3, 1943, informal discussion among Inland's stockholders began concerning the accumulation of a fund for the purchase of the stock of any deceased stockholder for the surviving stockholders. A special stockholders' meeting was held on that date at which it was formally resolved that Inland "purchase and pay for" insurance upon*177 the lives of certain of its stockholders as follows:

"G. C. Ealy$50,000
G. H. Nieman35,000
Oney S. Riggs10,000
J. W. MacDonald10,000
T. F. Doran10,000
G. B. Halverson10,000"
and

"that a contract be worked out among the stockholders whereby this insurance should be purchased, the premiums to be paid by the company and upon the death of either of those insured, the face of the policy on the one so deceased should be paid to the company and disbursed by the company to all of the stockholders as a special dividend and the proceeds received by said stockholders as a special dividend to be used by them to apply on the purchase of the stock in the Inland Motor Freight of the one so deceased."

In pursuance of the resolution, Inland, on July 14, 1943, made application to a life insurance company for the issuance of an insurance policy upon the life of Ealy in the face amount of $50,000, it being requested that Ealy's estate be the beneficiary. Similar applications were also made with respect to the other stockholders in accordance with the referred to corporate resolution. The insurance company, refusing to issue the policies with proceeds payable to the*178 estates of the respective assureds, issued in lieu thereof policies which were payable to Inland on the death of the insured. Inland's officers refused to accept such policies and, on October 25, 1943, a special meeting of the board of directors was held at which it was resolved that Inland "purchase said insurance" in the manner set forth in a contract entered into by and between the majority of the stockholders, dated July 10, 1943.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doran v. Commissioner, 1956 T.C. Memo. 121, 15 T.C.M. 629, 1956 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 175 (tax 1956).

1956 T.C. Memo. 121 (Doran v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co.
265 U.S. 189 (Supreme Court, 1924)
May v. Commissioner
20 B.T.A. 282 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)