Doran v. Brown
This text of 48 P. 251 (Doran v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent moves to strike the appellants’ brief for the reason that no assignment of errors appears therein. This motion must be sustained. There seems to be no attempt whatever to make an assignment of errors in appellants’ brief. Abstract law propositions are discussed, but it is impossible to determine from such discussion whether the discussion applies to the case tried or not. The brief is more faulty in this respect than was that in the case of Haugh v. Tacoma, 12 Wash. 386 (41 Pac. 173), where the brief of appellant was stricken for the reason that there were no assignments of error made therein. Appellants’ brief will, therefore, be stricken and the judgment appealed from affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 P. 251, 16 Wash. 703, 1897 Wash. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doran-v-brown-wash-1897.