Dorado v. Dorado
653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4388, 1995 WL 238809
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1995·No. No. 94-1683·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Pedro J. Dorado, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm.
We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in the equitable distribution, lump sum and permanent alimony awards. See Van-dergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1984). The case is remanded to the trial court to comply with the wife’s request to have her maiden name reinstated.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorado v. Dorado, 653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4388, 1995 WL 238809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
653 So. 2d 513 (Dorado v. Dorado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nardi v. Nardi
993 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)