Dorado v. Dorado

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dorado v. Dorado

653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4388, 1995 WL 238809

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1683

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 653 So. 2d 513 (Dorado v. Dorado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorado v. Dorado, 653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4388, 1995 WL 238809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Pedro J. Dorado, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm.

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in the equitable distribution, lump sum and permanent alimony awards. See Van-dergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1984). The case is remanded to the trial court to comply with the wife’s request to have her maiden name reinstated.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Pedro J. Dorado, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm.

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in the equitable distribution, lump sum and permanent alimony awards. See Van-dergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1984). The case is remanded to the trial court to comply with the wife’s request to have her maiden name reinstated.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4388, 1995 WL 238809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorado-v-dorado-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack