Dora Garza v. Woodsboro Little League and Mark Blascke
This text of Dora Garza v. Woodsboro Little League and Mark Blascke (Dora Garza v. Woodsboro Little League and Mark Blascke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
DORA GARZA, Appellant,
WOODSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE
AND MARK BLASCKE, Appellees.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on November 6, 2009. On November 9, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
17th day of December, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dora Garza v. Woodsboro Little League and Mark Blascke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dora-garza-v-woodsboro-little-league-and-mark-blas-texapp-2009.