Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.

303 A.D.2d 322, 755 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 322 (Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doomes v. Best Transit Corp., 303 A.D.2d 322, 755 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael DeMarco, J.), entered October 22, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries and wrongful death arising out of a single vehicle accident involving a minibus owned and operated by defendants-appellants and manufactured by defendants-respondents Warrick Industries and Ford Motor Company, granted Warrick’s motion for a protective order against appellants’ notices to take the depositions of three of Warrick’s former employees and an outside consultant, granted Ford’s motion for a protective order against appellants’ notice to take the deposition of a second Ford witness, and denied appellants’ cross motion for sanctions against Warrick, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We reject appellants’ contention that Warrick can be com[323]*323pelled to use its “best efforts” to produce former employees, or an outside consultant who was never its employee, unless it proves that it no longer has any control or influence over them (cf. CPLR 3101 [a] [1]; 3106 [b]; see Holloway v Cha Cha Laundry, 97 AD2d 385, 386 [1983]; DiMare v New York City Tr. Auth., 81 AD2d 574 [1981]). Ford has already produced a witness who gave a lengthy deposition, and appellants fail to show that the second Ford witness they now want to depose has any additional useful information. We have considered and rejected appellants’ other arguments. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 06556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 A.D.2d 322, 755 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doomes-v-best-transit-corp-nyappdiv-2003.