Doolittle v. Barr

10 Pa. D. & C. 820, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 246
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County
DecidedDecember 20, 1927
DocketNo. 455
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Pa. D. & C. 820 (Doolittle v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doolittle v. Barr, 10 Pa. D. & C. 820, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 246 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927).

Opinion

Hirt, J.,

The Act of March 22, 1814, P. L. 190, gives jurisdiction to justices of the peace in actions of trespass for injury to real or personal property, where the damages sustained do not exceed $100. The jurisdiction as to amount was increased to $300 by the Act of July 7, 1879, P. L. 194, but the justice has jurisdiction only where the injury is immediate and would be recoverable in the common law action of trespass vi et armis, and not such as are consequential and would be recoverable, if at all, in an action of trespass on the ease: Miller v. Snyder, 6 D. & C. 475; Sharp v. Boyer, 6 D. & C. 597.

Defendant attacks plaintiff’s statement of claim by motion to strike off, on the ground that plaintiff’s statement shows a demand of more than $100 in amount, contending that the justice’s jurisdiction is limited in cases of this kind to $100, under section 36 of the Act of June 14, 1923, P. L. 718. This Act of 1923 does not repeal the Act of July 7, 1879, and the apparent intention was not to modify the jurisdiction of justices generally in trespass eases under existing law, but to provide an additional remedy: Sharp v. Boyer, 6 D. & C. 597; Petros v. Crawl, 74 Pitts. L. J. 55.

The statement, however, is defective, in that plaintiff has failed to allege the items of damage with sufficient particularity.

Therefore, the rule granted Sept. 26, 1927, on defendant’s motion to strike off statement of claim, is now, Dee. 20, 1927, made absolute, with leave to plaintiff to file a new statement within fifteen days.

Prom Otto Herbst, Brie, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Pa. D. & C. 820, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doolittle-v-barr-pactcomplerie-1927.