Dooley, W. v. Tate, F.
This text of Dooley, W. v. Tate, F. (Dooley, W. v. Tate, F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
WILLIAM DOOLEY, : No. 483 MAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : FLOYD A. TATE JR., BNG LOGISTICS, : LLC, AND BNG TRANSPORTATION : INCORPORATED, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Attorney Matthew B. Cole and the law firm Aivazoglou & Mikropoulos’s Motion for
Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Appellant is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dooley, W. v. Tate, F., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-w-v-tate-f-pa-2022.