Dooley v. Union Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Dooley v. Union Railway Co.

57 Misc. 145, 107 N.Y.S. 882

DecidedDecember 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Misc. 145 (Dooley v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dooley v. Union Railway Co., 57 Misc. 145, 107 N.Y.S. 882 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

The appellant seeks by this motion for a retaxation of costs, for a disallowance of the items before and after notice of argument, which items were taxed by the clerk. The appeal from the judgment was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on the ground that it was not appealable, and the appellant insists that the respondent is not entitled to the said items because there was actually no argument of the appeal.’7' The remittitur, however, [146]*146states that the cause came on for argument, and that after due deliberation the appeal in question was dismissed, with costs, and the affidavit, used upon the taxation, shows that the dismissal took place upon the argument. Since the appeal was not dismissed upon notice previously given, but only after it wás called in its regular order on the calendar, the clerk properly taxed the items objected to. Winchester v. Jackson, 7 U. S. 514; 9 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 455, note; Kanouse v. Martin, 4 N. Y. Super. Ct. 739; Matter of Wray Drug Co., 93 App. Div. 456.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giegerich, J.

The appellant seeks by this motion for a retaxation of costs, for a disallowance of the items before and after notice of argument, which items were taxed by the clerk. The appeal from the judgment was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on the ground that it was not appealable, and the appellant insists that the respondent is not entitled to the said items because there was actually no argument of the appeal.’7' The remittitur, however, [146]*146states that the cause came on for argument, and that after due deliberation the appeal in question was dismissed, with costs, and the affidavit, used upon the taxation, shows that the dismissal took place upon the argument. Since the appeal was not dismissed upon notice previously given, but only after it wás called in its regular order on the calendar, the clerk properly taxed the items objected to. Winchester v. Jackson, 7 U. S. 514; 9 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 455, note; Kanouse v. Martin, 4 N. Y. Super. Ct. 739; Matter of Wray Drug Co., 93 App. Div. 456.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Misc. 145, 107 N.Y.S. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-union-railway-co-nysupct-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack