Dooley v. Seaman
175 A.D. 903
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 175 A.D. 903 (Dooley v. Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dooley v. Seaman, 175 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The jury was instructed, perhaps unnecessarily, that they must find an express contract. There was no evidence to prove such a contract. The verdict cannot stand. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-seaman-nyappdiv-1916.