Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Dooley v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance

Dooley v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance

144 S.E. 34, 38 Ga. App. 240, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 161
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1928
Docket18870
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 34 (Dooley v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dooley v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance, 144 S.E. 34, 38 Ga. App. 240, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds.

2. “An exception to the refusal to grant a nonsuit will not be considered, where a verdict for the plaintiff is complained of as not supported by evidence.” Swope v. McKenney, 36 Ga. App. 168. This ruling disposes of the 3d ground of the amendment to the motion.

3. There is no error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the 4th special ground of the motion.

4. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swope v. McKenney
136 S.E. 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 34, 38 Ga. App. 240, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-philadelphia-fire-marine-insurance-gactapp-1928.