Dooley v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

587 F. App'x 757
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1514
StatusPublished

This text of 587 F. App'x 757 (Dooley v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dooley v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 587 F. App'x 757 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deborah A. Dooley appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting summary judgment and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Dooley leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dooley v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-00001-IMK, 2014 WL 1761924 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2014; Apr. 30, 2014). We deny Dooley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 F. App'x 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-mylan-pharmaceuticals-inc-ca4-2014.