Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of Pennsylvania
This text of 25 A.2d 893 (Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Egan in his opinion reported in ISO N. J. Kg. 75.
In the opinion, however, the learned Vice-Chancellor discusses the question of the right of John J. Buckley, general chairman of the System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood and of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, &c., itself to represent the clerks as bargaining agent with the employer Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. This question we do not consider necessary to the determination of the case and we consequently express no opinion thereon.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.2d 893, 131 N.J. Eq. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-co-of-pennsylvania-nj-1942.