Dooley v. Krellenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dooley v. Krellenstein

229 A.D. 757

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 757 (Dooley v. Krellenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dooley v. Krellenstein, 229 A.D. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The verdict, in our opinion, was not against the weight of the evidence, but was in conformity therewith. The order appealed from, however, should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the amount of the verdict was excessive. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and reinstate the verdict. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The verdict, in our opinion, was not against the weight of the evidence, but was in conformity therewith. The order appealed from, however, should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the amount of the verdict was excessive. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and reinstate the verdict. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-v-krellenstein-nyappdiv-1930.