Dooley and MacK, Inc. v. Buildtec Const.

983 So. 2d 1243, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9454, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1657
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2008
Docket3D06-3112
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 983 So. 2d 1243 (Dooley and MacK, Inc. v. Buildtec Const.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dooley and MacK, Inc. v. Buildtec Const., 983 So. 2d 1243, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9454, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

983 So.2d 1243 (2008)

DOOLEY AND MACK CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Appellant,
v.
BUILDTEC CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D06-3112.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 2008.

*1244 Gurley Dramis Lazo, Sarasota; Elizabeth K. Russo and Craig Lee Montz, Miami, for appellant.

Etcheverry Harrison and Guy W. Harrison and Edward Etcheverry, Plantation, for appellees.

Before SHEPHERD, SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of attorney's fees and costs to appellee Developers Surety and Indemnity Co., as the prevailing party in the underlying action. While this appeal was pending, this Court reversed and remanded the final summary judgment in that action. Dooley & Mack Constructors, Inc. v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co., 972 So.2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Thus, Developers is no longer the prevailing party, and the award of attorney's fees and costs to Developers must be reversed. Marty v. Bainter, 727 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("[A]n award of attorney's fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed.").

Accordingly, the order awarding Developers attorney's fees and costs is vacated, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings upon the disposition of the underlying action.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WILLIAM L. RAMOS, JR. v. MICHAEL HALPERN, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
United States v. Morrison
46 So. 3d 1064 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 So. 2d 1243, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9454, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dooley-and-mack-inc-v-buildtec-const-fladistctapp-2008.