Doolan v. Cunningham
4 P. 1193, 2 Cal. Unrep. 414
This text of 4 P. 1193 (Doolan v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doolan v. Cunningham, 4 P. 1193, 2 Cal. Unrep. 414 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
We have examined the record in this case and find it without error. The use of the word “defendant” instead of “defendants,” in the conclusions of law, is so clearly a mere clerical misprision that we do not think it entitled to any regard. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 P. 1193, 2 Cal. Unrep. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doolan-v-cunningham-cal-1884.