Doody v. Osterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doody v. Osterman

258 A.D. 760, 14 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 760 (Doody v. Osterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doody v. Osterman, 258 A.D. 760, 14 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in the above-entitled proceeding adjudging the defendant to be the father of a child born out of wedlock to the complainant, Bessie Butler, and from an order of filiation directing the defendant to pay the expenses incurred by the complainant in pregnancy, confinement and recovery and ordering further payments of six dollars per week for the support and education of said child. The evidence supports the judgment and order appealed from. Order of filiation, and judgment adjudging defendant to be the father of the child, unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in the above-entitled proceeding adjudging the defendant to be the father of a child born out of wedlock to the complainant, Bessie Butler, and from an order of filiation directing the defendant to pay the expenses incurred by the complainant in pregnancy, confinement and recovery and ordering further payments of six dollars per week for the support and education of said child. The evidence supports the judgment and order appealed from. Order of filiation, and judgment adjudging defendant to be the father of the child, unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 760, 14 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doody-v-osterman-nyappdiv-1939.