Donyelle Reel v. State

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-15-00230-CR,

06-15-00232-CR, 06-16-00023-CR, & 06-16-00026, CR

DONYELLE REEL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

BENNIE RAY GREEN, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

JOEY HUDDLESTON, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

BRYAN KEITH ROBERTS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th & 188th District Courts Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 44996-A, 44,842-A, 44,921-B, & 45160-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

ORDER

There are four separate, unrelated appeals pending before this Court that were presided

over by the same trial judge and that were reported, for the most part, by the same official court

reporter, Grelyn Freeman. Because these records are all currently due in fairly close proximity to

one another and because Ms. Freeman has already indicated in three of the four matters that she is

in need of additional time to complete the records, we have determined that it would benefit both

the Court and Ms. Freeman for us to enter a scheduling order establishing new filing deadlines for

the reporter’s records in each of these four matters. The table below lists the four matters by cause

number and style, indicates the current due date of the record and then, in the last column, identifies

the new filing deadline established by this order.

CAUSE NUMBER CASE STYLE CURRENT DUE DATE NEW DUE DATE 06-15-00230-CR Donyelle Reel v. The State of Texas 04/15/2016 05/06/2016 Bennie Ray Green v.

06-15-00232-CR 04/18/2016 05/20/2016 The State of Texas

06-16-00023-CR Joey Huddleston v. The State of Texas 04/27/2016 06/03/2016 Bryan Keith Roberts v.

06-16-00026-CR 06/23/2016 06/23/2016 The State of Texas

Our goal in entering this scheduling order is to provide Ms. Freeman with additional time

in which to complete these records and to obviate the need for additional motions for extensions

of time in these matters. While we recognize the possibility that extenuating circumstances could

arise, Ms. Freeman is cautioned that only truly extraordinary circumstances will justify further

extensions of time in any of these matters.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 26, 2016