Donut Shop v. Farrington

461 So. 2d 171, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2564, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1984·No. No. AY-267·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the deputy commissioner found it was in the claimant’s best interest to purchase a one-level house in Scotland.1 The deputy found such a house could be purchased for $35,-000 and ordered an advanced, lump sum payment be made in that amount in exchange for a $35 per week credit to be taken by the carrier until the full advance payment is recouped.

There is no competent, substantial evidence to support the deputy’s finding that a house in Scotland could be purchased for $35,000. The only evidence to that issue shows a house in Scotland can be purchased for 35,000 British pounds, which at the time of the hearing, was approximately $56,000. The cause is remanded for a correction of an apparent scrivener’s error. If this was not a scrivener’s error, the deputy must make a finding as to the cost of the house in Scotland that is supported by the evidence. If necessary, further evidence on the issue may be taken.

The order is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, C.J., and BOOTH, J., concur. THOMPSON, J., dissents.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donut Shop v. Farrington, 461 So. 2d 171, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2564, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 171 (Donut Shop v. Farrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whalen v. US ELEVATOR
486 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)