Dontrey Lamon Eason v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 1, 2011
Docket14-11-00124-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Dontrey Lamon Eason v. State (Dontrey Lamon Eason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dontrey Lamon Eason v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00124-CR

DONTREY LAMON EASON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1238829

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to theft of between $100,000 and $200,000.  After a pre-sentence investigation, on December 7, 2010, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  No motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until January 12, 2011.[1]

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal.  Id.  Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



[1]   The notice of appeal is dated January 10, 2011, more than thirty days after sentencing.  Therefore, the “mailbox” rule will not operate to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 9.29(b) (providing that a document received within 10 days of its due date is considered timely if it is mailed before the last day for filing). 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dontrey Lamon Eason v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dontrey-lamon-eason-v-state-texapp-2011.