Dontaye Jermaine Burton, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
This text of Dontaye Jermaine Burton, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Dontaye Jermaine Burton, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 16-0670 Filed February 8, 2017
DONTAYE JERMAINE BURTON, Applicant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Karen A. Romano,
Judge.
An applicant appeals the district court’s denial of his postconviction-relief
application. AFFIRMED.
Erin M. Carr of Carr & Wright, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Ogden, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee State.
Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Vaitheswaran, JJ. 2
VOGEL, Judge.
Dontaye Burton pled guilty to second-degree robbery and second-degree
burglary and was sentenced to two, consecutive ten-year terms in prison, with a
mandatory minimum of seven years. See Iowa Code § 902.12 (2009). At the
time he committed the offenses, Burton was twenty-one years old. He appealed
his conviction, but that appeal was dismissed as frivolous in 2012. In 2015,
Burton filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR). He asked that the
holding of State v. Lyle be extended to offenders who are twenty-five years old or
younger. 854 N.W.2d 378, 400 (Iowa 2014) (holding all mandatory minimum
sentences for juvenile offenders are unconstitutional). After a trial, the district
court denied Burton’s claim.
Like the district court, we are not free to ignore controlling supreme court
precedent. State v. Beck, 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). The court in
Lyle specifically stated:
[O]ur holding today has no application to sentencing laws affecting adult offenders. Lines are drawn in our law by necessity and are incorporated into the jurisprudence we have developed to usher the Iowa Constitution through time. This case does not move any of the lines that currently exist in the sentencing of adult offenders.
854 N.W.2d at 403. Contrary to Burton’s suggestion on appeal, nothing in the
supreme court’s recent decision of State v. Sweet undermines this holding. 879
N.W.2d 811 (Iowa 2016) (concluding a sentence of life without the possibility of
parole for a juvenile offender violates the Iowa Constitution). We thus summarily
affirm the district court’s denial of Burton’s PCR application pursuant to Iowa
Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), and (d).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dontaye Jermaine Burton, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dontaye-jermaine-burton-applicant-appellant-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2017.