Donovan v. Town of New Windsor

132 Misc. 860, 231 N.Y.S. 82, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1022
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 1928·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Tompkins, J.

The ordinance in question is unreasonable and oppressive because it prohibits rather than regulates the carrying of refuse into the town of New Windsor. It is a well-known fact that household refuse, decayed fruit and garbage may be carried in sealed vehicles or containers without being in any wise offensive or a nuisance. The town board has power, by ordinance, to reasonably regulate the transportation of such materials in or through the town, but this ordinance is prohibitive rather than regulatory and it is for that reason, in my opinion, invalid and unenforcible.

The plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite is granted, with ten dollars costs to the plaintiff to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donovan v. Town of New Windsor, 132 Misc. 860, 231 N.Y.S. 82, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).

132 Misc. 860 (Donovan v. Town of New Windsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiggins v. Town of Somers
149 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
Wiggins v. Town of Somers
6 Misc. 2d 380 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Jansen Farms, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis
171 N.E. 199 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1930)