Donovan v. State
This text of 122 N.W. 1022 (Donovan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not believed that any good purpose would be served by a recital of the testimony in .this case.' The plaintiff in error was convicted of rape. The crime was-, charged to have been committed June 1, 1906, upon the person of one Elsie Weichert, who was then under fourteen years-, of age and was adjudged a feeble-minded person before the-trial. The conviction was based upon the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecuting witness alone, and her story was intrinsically improbable and almost incredible. Under these circumstances the conviction cannot be sustained. The rule in such cases is that “where the evidence of the prosecuting witness bears upon its face evidence of unreliability, to sustain a conviction there should be corroboration by other evidence as to the principal facts relied on to constitute the crime.” O'Boyle v. State, 100 Wis. 296, 75 N. W. 989; Hofer v. State, 130 Wis. 576, 110 N. W. 391. Especially must this rule be held applicable in a case where the prosecuting witness is a person of feeble mind.
By the Gourt. — Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 N.W. 1022, 140 Wis. 570, 1909 Wisc. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-state-wis-1909.