Donovan v. Sallee

19 Mo. App. 593, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 276
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Mo. App. 593 (Donovan v. Sallee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donovan v. Sallee, 19 Mo. App. 593, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 276 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Hall, J.

The only question for our consideration is, whether the action of the court in refusing the above declaration of law was correct.

This is not a common law action of trespass. In this case no damages are asked; none are alleged. We .are clearly of the opinion that this action is for the penalty of five dollars, imposed by section 3922, Revised Statutes, which reads as follows:

“ If any person shall voluntarily throw down or open any doors, bars, gates or fences, and leave the same open or down, other than those that lead into his own inclosure, * * * he shall pay to the party injured the .sum of five dollars,” etc.

[596]*596There is no evidence whatever, tending to show that the defendants left the fence down. But on the contrary the defendant, Sallee, testified that he put np the fence as he went in and ont. Under the statute it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that the defendants-left the fence down. On account of the total failure of such evidence, the court properly refused to find for plaintiff, and rendered judgment for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

.All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Grubb
71 Mo. App. 214 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Mo. App. 593, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-sallee-moctapp-1885.